Majority of missosologists do complain rather routinely who made it to the semifinals list of Miss Earth and above all the crappy production of the finals night. But those who want to see the pageant downgraded as a minor pageant is a minority. We complain about the production of the finals night but we do salute the environmental works of the pageant. We complain about some of the semifinalists but we always welcome the winner - well, most of the time.
Sure, we have some disagreements with some of the choices of Miss Earth but don't we do that with Miss Universe and Miss World as well? As for the entertainment that the finals night should provide, didn't we find Miss World boring but we still watch it because we know that the pageant is beyond the crappy productions?
The real test to determine whether a pageant is worthy of being in Big4 is how it conducts itself beyond what we see on television. Olga Alava, the reigning Miss Earth, had been travelling far and wide, advocating about the preservation of the environment. Above all, she looks just ahhmazing!
Downgrading Miss Earth is not in the agenda of Missosology despite several major issues that became a source of disagreement among missosologists. You only fix things we it is broken. Why fix the Big4 when nothing's broken in the first place?