OPINION :: Miss Earth should get its act together

34
8742

me

 

In the recently concluded Queen of Ukraine pageant, it is interesting to know that the overall winner will not compete at the Miss Earth pageant. A runner-up will be sent instead. In a similar case, Krasa Rossii (Beauty of Russia), in a break from tradition, will also not send its winner to Miss Earth 2015. This is a worrying trend for the pageant. The Femina Miss India group for example is no longer prioritizing the pageant with its top 3 winners at the Femina Miss India being sent to Miss World, Miss Supranational and Miss Grand International. More and more pageants from across the globe are dropping Miss Earth from their major titles including that of Thailand, New Zealand, Slovak Republic and many more.

Of course, Miss Earth can be comforted that there are still countries that subscribe to the Big4 concept like in the case of Paraguay and Turkey. The Miss Venezuela pageant also still considers Miss Earth as one of the major international pageants. But the overall trend is not in favor of the Miss Earth pageant and this has to be fixed if the pageant wishes to enjoy its Big4 status. It is important that franchises should be issued to organizations and individuals that values it as it should be. Above all, the pageant should also work on the valid concerns of the pageant experts including the general opinion that the pageant is so friendly to Philippine delegates. It must also work on its production as well as on the perennial issue with regards to venue and stage design.

With a slew of new and smarter and aggressive pageants out there, Miss Earth can’t afford to simply continue what it is currently doing. It must innovate and improve further if it wishes to survive. If no action will be taken, it risks of being sidelined as a minor pageant and perhaps will simply die a natural death.

34 COMMENTS

  1. admittedly, there is truth to some concerns stated in the blog but what i cant agree is the opinion that there are more organizations that are planning to drop Miss Earth from its major titles. In Krassa Rossi for example, it is not always true that the main winner is sent to Miss Earth. there were only a few opportunities where the main winner was sent to Miss Earth. and it happened in 2012 and 2014. In those other years, a runner up was or a finalist was instead sent to Miss Earth. This 2015, its different, a title is appropriately given to the winner who will represent Russia in Miss Earth. It is the same with Ukraine. It is not always the main winner who get the opportunity to compete in Miss Earth. There will always be an appropriate title such as the Queen of Ukraine-Earth whose recipient competes in Miss Earth. In Slovak Republic, it is always the first runner up who competes in Miss Earth. In New Zealand, there is a separate competition for ME New Zealand. When Miss Earth was in Femina Miss India, it was always chosen among the top 3 winners, last year, the Miss Earth representative from India was chosen among the top 3 winners in Miss Diva. what is said here in this opinion piece in missosology is so MISINFORMED. Please get your facts correctly.

      • Post from Jessica, “admittedly, there is truth to some concerns stated in the blog but what i cant agree is the opinion that there are more organizations that are planning to drop Miss Earth from its major titles. In Krassa Rossi for example, it is not always true that the main winner is sent to Miss Earth. there were only a few opportunities where the main winner was sent to Miss Earth. and it happened in 2012 and 2014. In those other years, a runner up was or a finalist was instead sent to Miss Earth. This 2015, its different, a title is appropriately given to the winner who will represent Russia in Miss Earth. It is the same with Ukraine. It is not always the main winner who get the opportunity to compete in Miss Earth. There will always be an appropriate title such as the Queen of Ukraine-Earth whose recipient competes in Miss Earth. In Slovak Republic, it is always the first runner up who competes in Miss Earth. In New Zealand, there is a separate competition for ME New Zealand. When Miss Earth was in Femina Miss India, it was always chosen among the top 3 winners, last year, the Miss Earth representative from India was chosen among the top 3 winners in Miss Diva. what is said here in this opinion piece in missosology is so MISINFORMED. Please get your facts correctly.”

    • very true. they always drag MISS EARTH down but they always failed. Missosology should not post this kind of opinion very unprofessional and very cheap! Miss Earth is Miss Earth. #theBESTPageant

    • Agree. Nakakahiya. Sobrang nakakahiya na gawing interpreter ang co-candidate. Apart from that, nawawala ang prestige sa dami ng minor awards na kung saan-saan na lang nagsusulputan.

  2. Miss Earth organizaters should be more impartial in selecting the winners, I am sure that if they give chances to other countries the will be more accpeted in all the world, to be honest, it is boring to see only Filipino candidates as the winners or at leat in the top 4. ME is unknown in my country

  3. last year , we can clearly see the unfairment … the one who won almost all the events didn’t even place in top 16 & the one who missed out the major event is the winner…

    • From Jessica, “admittedly, there is truth to some concerns stated in the blog but what i cant agree is the opinion that there are more organizations that are planning to drop Miss Earth from its major titles. In Krassa Rossi for example, it is not always true that the main winner is sent to Miss Earth. there were only a few opportunities where the main winner was sent to Miss Earth. and it happened in 2012 and 2014. In those other years, a runner up was or a finalist was instead sent to Miss Earth. This 2015, its different, a title is appropriately given to the winner who will represent Russia in Miss Earth. It is the same with Ukraine. It is not always the main winner who get the opportunity to compete in Miss Earth. There will always be an appropriate title such as the Queen of Ukraine-Earth whose recipient competes in Miss Earth. In Slovak Republic, it is always the first runner up who competes in Miss Earth. In New Zealand, there is a separate competition for ME New Zealand. When Miss Earth was in Femina Miss India, it was always chosen among the top 3 winners, last year, the Miss Earth representative from India was chosen among the top 3 winners in Miss Diva. what is said here in this opinion piece in missosology is so MISINFORMED. Please get your facts correctly.”

  4. hahahaha MISINFORMED and di marunong magresearch and nagsulat ng opinion na ito. ang Missosology naman may ma i post lang eh. hahaha the more you try to destroy Miss Earth the more it will shine HAHAHA tantanan nyo na ang Miss Earth grabe ha. sabi nga sa kanta “what doesn’t kill you make you stronger. HAHA

    • Here’s the answer from Jessica, “admittedly, there is truth to some concerns stated in the blog but what i cant agree is the opinion that there are more organizations that are planning to drop Miss Earth from its major titles. In Krassa Rossi for example, it is not always true that the main winner is sent to Miss Earth. there were only a few opportunities where the main winner was sent to Miss Earth. and it happened in 2012 and 2014. In those other years, a runner up was or a finalist was instead sent to Miss Earth. This 2015, its different, a title is appropriately given to the winner who will represent Russia in Miss Earth. It is the same with Ukraine. It is not always the main winner who get the opportunity to compete in Miss Earth. There will always be an appropriate title such as the Queen of Ukraine-Earth whose recipient competes in Miss Earth. In Slovak Republic, it is always the first runner up who competes in Miss Earth. In New Zealand, there is a separate competition for ME New Zealand. When Miss Earth was in Femina Miss India, it was always chosen among the top 3 winners, last year, the Miss Earth representative from India was chosen among the top 3 winners in Miss Diva. what is said here in this opinion piece in missosology is so MISINFORMED. Please get your facts correctly.”

  5. who give a fuck with this article…. they need traffic so they will invent anything under the sun…. or may be missosology didnt get any money from miss earth organization thats why they keep doing this kind of article…. fuck you missosology

    • Jessica’s reply, “admittedly, there is truth to some concerns stated in the blog but what i cant agree is the opinion that there are more organizations that are planning to drop Miss Earth from its major titles. In Krassa Rossi for example, it is not always true that the main winner is sent to Miss Earth. there were only a few opportunities where the main winner was sent to Miss Earth. and it happened in 2012 and 2014. In those other years, a runner up was or a finalist was instead sent to Miss Earth. This 2015, its different, a title is appropriately given to the winner who will represent Russia in Miss Earth. It is the same with Ukraine. It is not always the main winner who get the opportunity to compete in Miss Earth. There will always be an appropriate title such as the Queen of Ukraine-Earth whose recipient competes in Miss Earth. In Slovak Republic, it is always the first runner up who competes in Miss Earth. In New Zealand, there is a separate competition for ME New Zealand. When Miss Earth was in Femina Miss India, it was always chosen among the top 3 winners, last year, the Miss Earth representative from India was chosen among the top 3 winners in Miss Diva. what is said here in this opinion piece in missosology is so MISINFORMED. Please get your facts correctly.”

    • “…or may be missosology didnt get any money from miss earth organization…” The exact problem why this regional pageant attracts less and less people every year and it’s clearly losing its international relevance (if ever had any, that is!).
      The place is abound with corruption and prizes are given for prices. Even their ‘supporters’ admit that only people receiving money from ME will say something good about them…
      The pageant only exist to promote the so-called strength of Philippines in the pageant world, hence, the fact that their sub-class representatives are always in the top 5…
      Destined to fail…next!

      • “The exact problem why this regional pageant attracts less and less people every year”… KNOW THE FACTS BEFORE YOU COMMENT YOU NONE SENSE FAGGOT! Since 2005 up to present..they have more than 80 entrants..same as MU in terms of no. of entrants.

    • As they say in the Renaissance Age, you people are “defenders of the faith”. Or should I say defenders of Miss Earth. It’s all good though. I actually agree with your guys.

  6. Someone in Missosology facebook page deleted my comments and BLOCKED me because i stated verifiable facts against this article. Clearly, this is just an article aimed at destroying Miss Earth and pushing another pageant up. Please Missosology, before posting this kind of article, be sure that its content is accurate and with bases.

  7. People are whining why Miss Philippine candidates are always being favored. Hmmm…maybe it is truly a cooking show. What a shame.

  8. How about Missosology gets its act together before Miss Earth? Where do you get this thrash of an article. From Pawee? Just mentioning his name alone stinks up the whole pageant world. Give us a break!

    • And the hosts to speak Portuguese and have all Brazilian judges, and to have no English interpreters………………….. hehehehehhehee………………….. that would be funny……………. Remember ME 2014 (Q&A portion for Brazil)?

  9. MIss Earth 2014 did not have a interpreter for Miss Brazil in the Q & A round. Now who will own up to that. It is very unfortunate that a contestant makes to the round and is left in the middle of the water like this….hello , it is sheer injustice.

LEAVE A REPLY